Data Governance
What is the difference between data governance and master data management?
Last reviewed
Direct answer
Master data management keeps core records such as residents, employees and units consistent across systems, usually by matching them and building a "golden" version. Data governance is broader. It decides definitions, authority and how disagreements are resolved for every important measure, including when the golden record itself is challenged. Master data management is one tool governance can use.
Why this happens
A golden record still needs someone with authority to decide which source wins each field, and a record of why. That is governance.
Master data management focuses on who or what an entity is. Many operating disputes are about events and measures, such as a census on a given night, which it does not settle.
Example: one metric, three definitions
Operations
Occupancy 92%
Residents divided by licensed beds.
Finance
Occupancy 90%
Billable resident days divided by available unit days.
Ownership report
Occupancy 91%
Occupied units divided by units in service.
- Which number governs?
- Operator Authority
- Governing Record
- SeniorCRE Intelligence
- Execution
Illustrative figures. Governance first. Intelligence second. Execution last.
Integration can move all three numbers into one place. Only governance decides which definition is approved for which purpose.
The governance question
Governance answers four questions for every important measure: what it means (definition), which system is authoritative for it (authority), how disagreements are resolved (reconciliation), and how anyone can trace the result back (lineage).
Evidence → Disagreement → Authority → Governing Record
What good operating infrastructure should do
- A register of approved definitions, owned by named people.
- Explicit source-authority rules per measure and per decision.
- A reconciliation process that records outcomes, not just corrections.
- Lineage from every reported number back to its sources.
- Change control when a definition or authority rule changes.
SeniorCRE perspective
SeniorCRE treats governance as the operator’s function, not the software’s. Its architecture encodes Definition, Authority, Reconciliation and Lineage as first-class records, so integration supplies evidence and the operator decides what governs. Unified data is not the same as governed truth. Status: the Governed Operating Record is designed and not yet implemented in any community. What has been built, validated and deployed is published on the evidence page, and nothing here should be read as a production result.