How does SeniorCRE screen for and act on social determinants of health?
Expected outcome
Referral and follow-through evidence
Modeled from workflow design and industry benchmarks. No customer communities measured yet — figures are targets, not validated results. See Industry Findings for methodology.
The problem
Clinical care addresses the diagnosis. But loneliness, financial stress, and cultural isolation affect outcomes just as much. Most communities do not screen for any of them.
How the platform runs it
SDOH screenings identify social isolation, financial barriers, and community resource needs. Cultural preferences are documented and visible to all care team members. When a need is identified, the system suggests vetted community resources, and referrals are tracked for follow-through.
On the shift
The social work module captures SDoH at admission and updates them quarterly: transportation barriers, food security, financial pressures on the family, social support network. When Mrs. D.’s daughter loses her job, the social worker logs the change; the system flags her for the next financial counseling slot and updates the care plan to reflect that family caregiving capacity has decreased. The MDS Section Q referrals are pre-populated from the SDoH record rather than re-asked.
What the outcome looks like
Evidence focus: SDOH screenings, documented preferences, referrals, and follow-through status are visible for whole-person care review. No quality-score outcome is claimed here.
What goes wrong without it
Most communities collect SDoH at admission, file it, and never update it. When circumstances change, nobody notices until a discharge fails because the family cannot drive to a follow-up appointment, or until a financial hardship surfaces 60 days into nonpayment. The MDS Section Q is filled out from memory.
Where this connects in the platform
Every clinical workflow runs on the same record. These are the feature pages, head-to-head comparisons, and pillar articles that go deeper on the surfaces this workflow touches.
Feature surfaces
Compared head-to-head
Clinical and quality references
Clinical workflows on this page run against the CMS RAI/MDS manual, the Quality Measure technical specifications, and the recognized clinical practice guidelines published by AGS, IDSA, and the Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society.
- Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual
CMS
The binding rulebook for MDS assessment timing, item coding, and look-back windows that drive both quality measures and PDPM scoring.
- MDS 3.0 Quality Measures User's Manual
CMS
Technical specifications for the long- and short-stay quality measures reported on Care Compare.
- Beers Criteria for Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Older Adults
American Geriatrics Society
Reference standard for psychotropic stewardship and high-risk medication review in older adults.
- CDC / NHSN Long-Term Care Facility Component
CDC
Definitions and surveillance protocols for UTI, respiratory, and multidrug-resistant organism tracking used in infection control.