Workforce & staffing
Most senior housing & care staffing software is a scheduling grid. SeniorCRE governs staffing context: acuity from the clinical record informs the staffing model, agency spend is capped at the shift, and turnover risk is forecast against the labor market using BLS OEWS as the external anchor.
Schedule generated from ADL and clinical acuity (design intent), not last quarter’s census assumption.
Per-shift agency caps, approval workflow, and weekly burn-rate dashboards visible to ED and regional.
Risk scoring on tenure, schedule volatility, overtime load, and exit signals — surfaced before the resignation.
An operator-set workload ceiling (80% of modeled nurse load by default) flags assignments that cross it before the schedule publishes.
Expiry windows, state-board verification, and shift-eligibility checks before the schedule publishes.
Pay-band benchmarking against BLS OEWS by market and role, not a stale internal comp survey.
Scheduling tools optimize for filled shifts. Operators are managing acuity, agency burn, license risk, and burnout at the same time. Optimizing one variable leaves the others unmanaged. SeniorCRE schedules against all four because they share the same operating record.
The workforce intelligence engine runs on the same operator-controlled operating record as the clinical and financial signals — so the agency-spend alert that hits the regional inbox is reconciled against acuity coverage and payer mix, not generated in a vacuum.
No pilot benchmark is published, because no operator runs SeniorCRE in production. What a pilot establishes is the operator-declared definition of agency hours, the system declared to govern it, and a preserved baseline to measure against later. The pilot methodology is in the proof architecture.
Walk an operations and finance lead through the governed-record validation plan.