SeniorCRE is the operator-controlled operating infrastructure for senior housing & care. It is designed to govern definitions, source authority, reconciliation, and lineage across the systems an operator already runs, and can carry selected system-of-record functions where the operator chooses. Govern first. Replace only by choice.

How is SeniorCRE different from PointClickCare?

PointClickCare is a clinical EHR. Operators can keep PointClickCare; SeniorCRE is designed to govern definitions and source authority above it. Where an operator chooses, SeniorCRE can assume selected system-of-record functions. Govern first. Replace only by choice.

How is SeniorCRE different from Yardi Senior Living Suite?

Yardi Senior Living Suite is a property-management and accounting system. Operators can keep Yardi Senior Living Suite; SeniorCRE is designed to govern definitions and source authority above it. Where an operator chooses, SeniorCRE can assume selected system-of-record functions. Govern first. Replace only by choice.

How is SeniorCRE different from MatrixCare or ALIS?

MatrixCare or ALIS is a clinical and community-management system. Operators can keep MatrixCare or ALIS; SeniorCRE is designed to govern definitions and source authority above it. Where an operator chooses, SeniorCRE can assume selected system-of-record functions. Govern first. Replace only by choice.

How does SeniorCRE approach HIPAA and security?

SeniorCRE signs Business Associate Agreements and is designed with the administrative, physical, and technical safeguards applicable to its role under HIPAA. SOC 2 in progress.

Who is SeniorCRE for?

Senior housing & care operators, REITs, and capital partners. Our operator beachhead is organizations running 10 to 40 communities; larger portfolios are served through a separate Strategic Enterprise engagement.

How much does SeniorCRE cost?

Pricing and implementation fees are set in the applicable order form.

How long does SeniorCRE take to implement?

Deployment is gate-based and operator-specific; SeniorCRE publishes no standard implementation duration.

SeniorCRE · Bounded pre-production co-development

Founding Operator Program

Start with one number your organization is prepared to stand behind.

Foundations. One governed occupancy field. Rules, reconciliation and evidence a reviewer can trace to source. A defined first phase—not access to a finished platform.

Participation fee · USD: Founding Operator Program: $50,000
Genuine program limit: 5 places
Included scope: First governed-field phase

Request an Executive Briefing

Executive discussions precede admission. Participation, payment and delivery require a written agreement; no place is reserved by requesting a briefing.

Before you commit

How a co-development partnership is scoped, governed and judged

A walkthrough of how a co-development partnership with SeniorCRE is scoped, governed and judged. The operating record it describes is designed and not yet implemented in any community.

Watch: Co-Development Walkthrough · 5:16

Open the video page and transcript

Current readiness · October 22, 2026

Component status describes controlled-environment progress only. The Operator-Controlled Operating Record as a whole is designed and not yet implemented in any community as of October 22, 2026; no operator-production deployment or measured operator outcome is claimed.

Operator Executive Edition · October 2026

The operator executive booklet

A 12-page executive brief on conflicting numbers, operator authority, the first governed-field phase and the evidence required before production reliance.

Evidence status dated October 16, 2026. The Operating Record is designed and not yet implemented in any community; examples are synthetic, not measured outcomes.

Download operator booklet

PDF · 12 pages · 139 KB

What the fee covers

A first field. A reviewable trail. A clear stopping point.

The package follows the program’s statement of work: foundations and the first governed-field segment through the calibration checkpoint. The engineering scope is not the operator’s participant agreement.

Timing to the first artifact and checkpoint

SeniorCRE Engineering estimates 4–5 months to the board-reviewable artifact. This is a planning estimate, not a typical duration or a promised calibration-checkpoint date. Before commitment, agree the checkpoint schedule, its starting point, authorized data access, delivery ownership and acceptance dependencies in writing. No automatic clock after data access is established.

Tested foundations

The first-field foundation covers tenancy, access, audit history, definitions, lineage and a census adapter. Controlled tests are not operator-production evidence.

One governed occupancy figure

A defined occupancy field with preserved source assertions, visible disagreement, an operator-defined authority rule and reconciliation. Not a portfolio-wide deployment.

Independently traceable evidence

A board-reviewable artifact whose governed figure can be walked back to its source rows by a reviewer outside the build team. The review is an acceptance requirement, not a completed review.

A deliberate checkpoint

Review the foundations and first-field exit tests, then calibrate the next segment on measured delivery pace. Nothing beyond this checkpoint is included or pre-committed.

Review the first governed occupancy proof requirements

Boundaries

Not all of Pilot One.

The first-field artifact and the operator’s own contested number resolved in recurring use are distinct proofs. Completing one does not establish the other. Later operator-use and expansion gates need subsequent commitments.

Review scope and participation terms

The remainder of Pilot One, additional governed fields and portfolio expansion.
Real-file operator proof, recurring close acceptance and the later operator-use proof window; these are separate, subsequent gates.
Medication administration, eMAR, clinical workflows, write-back and money movement.
A finished-platform subscription, replacement of incumbent systems or five simultaneous implementations.
Support, on-call coverage, steward training and operator-success services unless separately owned, funded and agreed.
Guaranteed savings, occupancy gains, clinical outcomes or a promised delivery date.

Capacity and sequencing

Five places. Implementation follows proof.

Five program places, not five simultaneous implementations. A further operator implementation depends on the first operator’s proof and expansion gates, delivery capacity and a separately agreed commitment. No start date or remaining-place count is claimed.

01
Agree the first phase
Confirm fit, ownership, authorized inputs, scope, commercial protections and acceptance criteria in writing.
02
Review the first field
Test the foundations and walk the occupancy figure to source evidence; evaluate the checkpoint before extending scope.
03
Authorize what follows
Real operator use, recurring close proof and additional implementations require subsequent funding, agreements and cleared gates.

Bring the disagreement—and the authority to settle it.

Direct operators of 10–40 communities; multi-state preferred. Portfolio size is a boundary, not the reason to qualify. The starting point is a recurring occupancy disagreement with an accountable executive owner.

An executive sponsor and an accountable owner for the disputed occupancy number.
Agreement on the occupancy definition, purpose, reporting period and source authority.
Authorized source access and data-handling arrangements before any real operator data is used.
Written scope, acceptance criteria and participation terms before commitment.

Illustrative senior housing community exterior — Illustrative community image—not a participating operator or deployment.

Questions before committing

How long before the calibration checkpoint?: SeniorCRE Engineering estimates 4–5 months to the board-reviewable artifact. This is a planning estimate, not a typical duration or a promised calibration-checkpoint date. Before commitment, agree the checkpoint schedule, its starting point, authorized data access, delivery ownership and acceptance dependencies in writing. No automatic clock after data access is established.
What does the $50,000 fee buy?: $50,000 for foundations and the first governed occupancy field, including its rules, reconciliation and independently traceable evidence. Later phases and the remainder of Pilot One are excluded.
Does five places mean five implementations at once?: Five program places, not five simultaneous implementations. A further operator implementation depends on the first operator’s proof and expansion gates, delivery capacity and a separately agreed commitment. No start date or remaining-place count is claimed.
Is the operating record running in a community?: Component status describes controlled-environment progress only. The Operator-Controlled Operating Record as a whole is designed and not yet implemented in any community as of October 22, 2026; no operator-production deployment or measured operator outcome is claimed.
Will we have to replace our current systems?: No. This first governed-field phase follows Road 1: read-only alongside incumbent systems. The wider deployment strategy also allows operator-selected SeniorCRE system-of-record functions, after their own build, safety and acceptance gates; those functions are outside this fee’s scope.
Are payment terms and delivery dates finalized?: 50/50 payment: $25,000 at execution and $25,000 on acceptance of the first governed occupancy field. Cancellation refunds any amount paid above work actually performed within 30 days. No delivery date is promised. The participant agreement records responsibilities and acceptance criteria. A briefing is not enrollment, a payment request or a reserved place.
What is the next step?: Request an Executive Briefing with one disputed occupancy number and its accountable owner. Review fit, the first-field scope, dependencies and participation terms before either party commits.

Modeled example · October 16, 2026

What does one unresolved occupancy figure cost?

A recurring disagreement can consume staff time every month. This synthetic example prices only the labor spent reconciling one occupancy figure—not lost revenue or a promised benefit from SeniorCRE.

Communities

Reconciliation hours / community / month

Loaded labor cost / hour · USD

Per community / month: $600
Portfolio / month: $6,000
Portfolio / year: $72,000
Three more months, unchanged: $18,000

Under these assumptions, the annual reconciliation-labor burden is $72,000, compared with the $50,000 first governed-field fee. Continuing the same effort for three more months models $18,000 of additional labor burden—not a delivery period or an amount the phase will save.

Assumptions and provenance: Synthetic teaching assumptions, approved by SeniorCRE management on October 16, 2026. Community count, monthly reconciliation hours and loaded hourly labor cost are invented—not operator observations, public benchmarks or market estimates.

Formula: Per-community monthly burden = hours spent reconciling one occupancy figure × loaded hourly labor cost. Portfolio monthly burden = community count × per-community burden. Annual burden = monthly burden × 12; three-month waiting scenario = monthly burden × 3.

Limits: Reconciliation labor only; no assumed lost revenue, occupancy gains or recoverable savings. Assumes the same recurring effort in every community, unchanged for the selected period. Labor costs may already be budgeted and are not necessarily avoidable cash expenditure. The $50,000 phase covers one governed field, not a portfolio rollout; the occupancy figure modeled here is the field the program governs. Comparing burden with the fee is not ROI, payback or evidence that SeniorCRE will remove that burden. Delivery and later operator-use gates still apply. Inputs stay in your browser and are not saved or submitted.

Founding Operator participation

Apply for a fit review.

$50,000 for foundations and the first governed occupancy field; 5 program places, not simultaneous implementations. An application is not admission, a reserved place or a payment obligation.

Checking sign-in…

Explore the REIT, Investor, and Operator Platforms

The next step

Begin with an Executive Briefing.

Identify your disputed occupancy number, its owner and what acceptance would require. Then decide whether the first governed-field phase is a fit—before enrollment or payment.

Request an Executive Briefing

Review current evidence and security status Scope and participation terms

Credibility does not require perfection. It requires making limitations visible, distinguishing design from demonstrated capability, and stating what evidence would change the assessment.

Last verified October 22, 2026 · the single status date used on every page

Current capability and deployment boundary

Operators may retain existing systems, or select future SeniorCRE system-of-record functions after their required gates clear. Neither replacement nor immediate production availability is implied.

Designed: The Operator-Controlled Operating Record is designed and not yet implemented in any community. Authority rules, reconciliation, and field-level lineage are design intent; synthetic examples do not establish working governance. Request implemented source authority, reconciliation and lineage, followed by operator-owned acceptance. Medication administration/eMAR remains not built.
Built: Clinical record surfaces are built; a built surface is not an accepted clinical system or a built operating record. Provisioning controls have been exercised repeatedly in controlled SeniorCRE conditions, including the operator onboarding wizard. Not yet performed for an operator in production; no standard duration is published. Inspect the exact function and executable artifact; require function-specific safety, security and workflow gates before reliance. Request the controlled test record, data classification and limitations. Synthetic/de-identified tests are not operator acceptance or a live named-vendor connector.
Operator deployment: No workflow has been accepted end to end by a named operator owner against operator data. Require the named operator owner, scope, acceptance date and the accepted workflow record.
Production evidence: No operator-production deployment, 10+ community rollout or measured production result is established. Require named operator consent, scope, acceptance date, baseline and measured production evidence before treating a result as proven.

Prerequisites and acceptance gates

Operator-approved scope, metric definitions, source authority and accountable approver.
Authorized source access, vendor permissions, data readiness, entity mapping and security review.
Function-specific build and end-to-end reconciliation, permission, failure and lineage tests.
Recorded operator acceptance against agreed criteria before production reliance.

Evidence to inspect

Versioned metric dictionary, source-authority matrix and entity map.
Source-specific access record, mapping, test results and unresolved exception register.
Authorized determination, preserved source-row lineage and signed acceptance record.

Clinical scope and explicit exclusions

Clinical record surfaces are built; medication administration and eMAR remain roadmap — not built, excluded from Road 2 starting scope and unavailable for production today. The future native clinical configuration requires function-specific build completion, clinical-safety review and clinical sign-off, end-to-end workflow validation, data readiness, operator acceptance before production entry. No community runs SeniorCRE as its clinical system of record.

No operator-production deployment, live named connector, measured portfolio rollout or standard go-live duration is claimed. Replacement of a fixed number of systems within hours is not an available offer or a measured result. Medication administration/eMAR and third-party write-back are excluded from starting scope. Synthetic examples, architecture documents and controlled tests are not operator acceptance.

Founding Operator Program

How a co-development partnership is scoped, governed and judged

The operator executive booklet

A first field. A reviewable trail. A clear stopping point.

Timing to the first artifact and checkpoint

Tested foundations

One governed occupancy figure

Independently traceable evidence

A deliberate checkpoint

Not all of Pilot One.

Five places. Implementation follows proof.

Agree the first phase

Review the first field

Authorize what follows

Bring the disagreement—and the authority to settle it.

Questions before committing

What does one unresolved occupancy figure cost?

Apply for a fit review.

Begin with an Executive Briefing.

Current capability and deployment boundary

Prerequisites and acceptance gates

Evidence to inspect

Clinical scope and explicit exclusions

Founding Operator Program

How a co-development partnership is scoped, governed and judged

The operator executive booklet

A first field. A reviewable trail. A clear stopping point.

Timing to the first artifact and checkpoint

Tested foundations

One governed occupancy figure

Independently traceable evidence

A deliberate checkpoint

Not all of Pilot One.

Five places. Implementation follows proof.

Agree the first phase

Review the first field

Authorize what follows

Bring the disagreement—and the authority to settle it.

Questions before committing

What does one unresolved occupancy figure cost?

Apply for a fit review.

Begin with an Executive Briefing.