Skip to main contentSkip to navigation
Loading...

Source Authority

Who determines source authority?

Last reviewed

Direct answer

The executive accountable for decisions made with a measure should approve its source-authority rule, advised by the teams that run the systems involved. IT and vendors can recommend, but the rule belongs to the operator. Authority decisions should be recorded with the approver and date, and reviewed whenever systems or processes change.

Why this happens

Authority set by a vendor’s defaults reflects that vendor’s design, not the operator’s accountability.

Recording who approved a rule makes it possible to challenge and update it without starting the argument over from scratch.

Example: authority depends on the decision

  • Clinical system

    Authoritative for level of care

    Assessments are recorded and signed there.

  • Billing system

    Authoritative for the rate billed

    The contract and payer terms are applied there.

  • Payroll

    Authoritative for hours paid

    It is the system of record for compensation.

  1. Which number governs?
  2. Operator Authority
  3. Governing Record
  4. SeniorCRE Intelligence
  5. Execution

Illustrative figures. Governance first. Intelligence second. Execution last.

No single system is authoritative for everything. Authority is assigned per field and per decision.

The governance question

Authority is an organizational decision that software should record, not invent. When the authoritative source is wrong, the right response is a documented override with the original value preserved, not a silent edit.

Evidence → Disagreement → Authority → Governing Record

What good operating infrastructure should do

  • Per-field, per-decision authority rules approved by named owners.
  • Visible authority: users can see which source governs a number.
  • Override workflows that capture reason, approver and time.
  • Original values preserved after every override.
  • Periodic review of authority rules as systems change.

SeniorCRE perspective

SeniorCRE’s architecture records authority as a rule the operator approves, applies it when sources disagree, and keeps the overridden value with its reason and approver. Software can recommend; only the operator’s authority decides what governs. Status: the Governed Operating Record is designed and not yet implemented in any community. What has been built, validated and deployed is published on the evidence page, and nothing here should be read as a production result.

See the evidence record

All Source Authority questions

See how the Governed Operating Record works
SeniorCRE

Govern the truth before you automate the decision.

SeniorCRE is the operator-controlled operating infrastructure for senior housing & care.

SeniorCRE establishes operator-controlled definitions, source authority, reconciliation, and lineage across care, labor, census, revenue, compliance, NOI, and capital decisions.

Current evidence status

SeniorCRE publishes what is built, what has been built, what has reached operator production, and what remains unproven.

Last verified: September 29, 2026

View the Evidence Record

Definition. Authority. Reconciliation. Lineage. The four that make data governable.

Governance first. Intelligence second. Execution last. Model confidence never creates organizational authority.

SeniorCRE

Operating Infrastructure for Senior Housing & Care.

© 2026 SeniorCRE, LLC. A HavenCo company. SeniorCRE® and Operator Authority Chain™ are marks of SeniorCRE, LLC.

View full legal disclosures